Southern Religion

H.R. 3 is an exercise in senseless hypocrisy

Incoherence, thy name is H.R. 3.

Falsely entitled the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act,” it is bafflegab written given bizarre and for honest people indefensible legal condification, as Kristin explains:

In the case of abortion and health care, religious right organizations claim that even if individuals purchase their own abortion coverage, any tax subsidy for health care coverage that includes abortion constitutes federal funding– which is why they’re trying to pass the extreme H.R. 3 “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act.” But in the case of church exemptions and school vouchers for parochial schools, these same groups argue that a tax deduction or subsidy is not a form of government funding (because if it were, it’d be a clear violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment).

In a House of Representatives hearing on the bill last week, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) exposes the incoherence of their argument while questioning Cathy Ruse from the Family Research Council and Richard Doerflinger from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Check out the video:


February 17, 2011 - Posted by | Politics | , , ,

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: